In continuance of our discussion on logical fallacies I thought it would behoove us to cover a common flaw in contemporary argumentation. That is, subjective vs. objective statement. The question we will answer here is whether subjective statements cannot also be objective.

Are fallacies of relativism the same or similar to the fallacy of personal incredulity? Thats the topic of this breif discussion.

Apologies for the audio glitches

This is the 3rd video of a series on Logical Fallacies and Argumentation. We can't begin to find flaws of an argument without first understanding what we are looking for. In this video I share with you how Philosophy and logic both share the same referential principles or antecedents. A written description of the philosophical antecedents can be found at the link below. Link to essay: https://www.atthesymposium.org/copy-of-physics-and-the-classics

Colleges get a lot of flak these days and some of it warrented though here are three valuable things academia will condition you into.

During the process of working on a video on argumentation and logical fallacies I thought I'd throw one together having to do with a common fault made when people analyze events and outcomes.

Every argument is underpined by a value. In this video I expound on how values relate to emotions and how emotions are set into hierarchies. I also have a brief video essay related to this topic that can be found at the link below. https://youtu.be/BKyTLnX_ftQ